SHALLA
CHATS with Elizabeth Kadetsky
“Writing Great Short Stories”
by Shalla DeGuzman
First
of all, who’s Elizabeth?
Elizabeth Kadetsky
has been a fellow to Camargo Foundation and MacDowell, a Fulbright to India
and a Dodge Foundation grantee for
writers affected
by September 11, and has won a fellowship to the Wesleyan Writers Conference
and scholarships to Sewanee and Breadloaf.
Aside from the
upcoming Best New American Voices, her short stories have appeared in The
Pushcart Prizes Anthology,
Gettysburg Review, Santa Monica Review, Natural Bridge, Red Rock
Review,
Cream City Review, Greensboro Review and elsewhere. Her short-story
manuscript was the top selection in the 2004 AWP Grace Paley Prize
in Short Fiction
and has been a finalist in the Iowa Short Fiction Award and the Flannery
O’Connor Award, while Chris Offut chose one of her stories as the top
selection in the Iowa Prize; others have been honorable mentions or finalists
in prizes from Atlantic Monthly Student Fiction, the Dana Award, New Millennium,
Crazyhorse, the Lorian Hemingway Short Fiction Contest, Southeast Review
Short-Shorts, the Dora Teitelboim Center for Yiddish Culture, the Center
Press, and the Heekin Group/Tara Fellowship. She is working on a novel set
in India and is also the author of memoir set in India, First There Is a
Mountain, published by Little Brown in 2004.
She holds an
MFA in fiction from UC Irvine and teaches in the creative writing program
at Sarah Lawrence
College and at Columbia University’s School of Journalism.
Shalla: Hello Elizabeth, thank you for joining us. Congratulations on receiving
so many awards for your fiction.
Elizabeth: Thanks Shalla
Shalla: Are you working on a collection of short stories? Please tell us
about it. Does it have a specific theme?
Elizabeth: I’ve had a manuscript in progress since I finished my MFA,
in 1999, though it’s been through many incarnations and has changed
titles several times. In its most respect aspect it is titled “What
We Saw and Other Stories” and includes seven pieces that I feel all
hold together though a certain sensibility and subject matter, though this
is less rigidly defined than in past versions. I have about twenty completed
stories, most of which have been published and/or cited for prizes.
In one
previous version, the collection had the subtitle “Love and Loss in
Distant Places,” which I felt encapsulated a running theme of the traveler-seeker
who encounters trouble abroad. But now, the pieces are in a weird way more
coherently interconnected, but that’s more through voice and thematic
preoccupation than subject matter.
They’re urban, sometimes apocalyptic,
and generally deal with a narrator’s attempts to reconcile an irrational
belief in a kind of fated, even spiritual harmonic universe with a
more existential and dark urban and transglobal reality, one challenged
by cultural disconnects
and a breakdown of idealism, or, perhaps better said, a clash of differing
idealisms. Shalla: What inspires you to write?
Elizabeth: I started doing it when I was twelve and it, along with other
kinds of artistic expression, gave me an exalted and sometimes ebullient
or even ecstatic feeling. An ability to access this feeling carried me through
the difficult years of adolescence and the random other rough spots.
At some
point I also came to a kind of understanding about what made certain
writing great, and transcendent, and I wanted to emulate those writers
who were producing
that writing. I still do. Bernard Malamud comes to mind, to name
just one, rather randomly.
Shalla: Where do you find your stories? And how do you generate
ideas?
Elizabeth: I have too many ideas. It’s one reason that I like to
teach nonfiction.
I can hand out
story ideas and then cross those ideas off the endless lists
in my notebook, and hopefully then move on to a clean notebook
-- that is once everything in the old notebook has been taken
care of or doled out.
I’m constantly taking down notes about odd things I notice, juxtapositions,
images, funny bits of dialogue. For instance a guy talking on his
cell phone as he races past the Gandhi statue in Union Square Park in
NYC jabbering
about he’s going to the gym every day this week so he can lose
exactly five pounds before his trip to Australia. I’m never sure
how or whether these bits will develop into stories. Once they get too
old they become stale
and can’t. I’m generally not aware of why something caught
the attention of my subconscious, but I find that if I play with it while
it’s
still fresh the text that results ends up revealing the ways that
it was connected to all kinds of deeper themes that were ruminating in
my brain without my explicit knowledge. As you can imagine, my
rough drafts
are, as
a result, very rough.
The story in Best New American Voices arose from an image,
where I was bicycling on a rainy night with my then-boyfriend
and a
mutual friend, and I did indeed have my bicycle chain strapped
around my waist. My boyfriend
was wearing all black and looked invisible in the darkness,
and the downpour was further engulfing him, and I thought ‘Oh my god, he’s going
to die.’ I wondered if that feeling of protectiveness that I was experiencing
was akin to a feeling of love.’ The story was originally about the
chain, but also about the threesome, based on my boyfriend, my friend,
and me. Then my boyfriend and I had to break up, thank goodness, and
I realized the story was really about the grief of lost or disappointing
love. Shalla: You’re
a very talented writer. How do you create characters who live and breathe
on the page?
Elizabeth: Oh thanks! I’ve written some very bad things, and
learned through trial and error. One thing that I was terrible at,
at first, was dialogue, though it’s odd because I was a journalist
and consummate eavesdropper. One day it seemed that something dropped
down on me and I suddenly understood how to write good dialogue.
Perhaps I’d already internalized that rule (I think it’s
Jon Gardner’s) about dialogue -- that in kinetic speech people
rarely answer each other directly -- but there was a way that it
seemed I in particular had a good ear for speech, only I’d
never figured out how to exploit that in my fiction. I have studied
a lot of languages and speak a couple of them okay, for instance;
and I had long trained my ear by memorizing pieces of speech while
doing interviews as a journalist, ie when the speaker speaks too
fast for you to write it all down in an efficient amount of time,
and you have to develop mnemonics so you can write down their words
a few seconds later, while the subject is talking about something
else less relevant to your story.
As
for writing, I study craft all the time, by watching movies
and examining their screenplays, and
reading novels and stories, and to a lesser extent going over the
better craft books (Oakley Hall, Gardner, EM Forster). Shalla: Do you outline your stories before you begin writing them? And if
you do, do you have any tips on how to do this effectively?
Elizabeth: No.
I am a very disorganized writer, and therefore a slow writer who needs
many drafts before a story is done. I believe a
novel needs tighter
control in this sense, so I’ve been experimenting with outlines. For
a story I think you need to know the kernel of the story before you move
from the random idea-writing phase to giving it an actual shape. This applies,
I think, less to the “meaning” part of it than to the “what
happens” part. It’s easier to let the lyricism and significance
of a story evolve organically when you’re not belaboring plot, so I
like to give myself a fairly simple story to hang everything else on,
and then more or less stick to that story, though perhaps without knowing
the
actual ending.
For instance,
in the bicycle story, I knew that the central conflict was a narrative
one—the narrator is locked in her chain and she must get
out. This presented a natural dramatic structure with the traditional three
acts: situation develops (she gets locked in her chain); conflict arises
(she must get out of her chain); resolution is thwarted (she can’t
get out of her chain); a plan B resolution is discovered, something unexpected
(she finds an elegant way out of a problem differently defined). Of course
the story’s not really “about” the chain, in the larger
sense, so it didn’t seem fruitful or important to tinker with those
broad outlines.
Shalla: How do you choose the setting of your stories?
Elizabeth: Setting
is key in my pieces, so it’s usually decided beforehand,
or is part of the actual impetus for writing the story. There was a time
in the eighties when the media discovered the cliché “such and
such is a character” in so and so’s work (Food is a character!
Time is a character! Architecture is a character!). I slap myself on the
wrist as I use that cliché, but place is very much a character in
everything I write.
Shalla: How do you choose which POV (point of view) to use?
Elizabeth: That,
weirdly, tends to be decided without my thinking about it too much either.
I’ve been trying to wean myself off first person
since I was a self-involved adolescent -- people would accuse you of the
most horrible things when you used it, like trying to sound like Sylvia Plath.
But it’s been hard, especially since Joan Didion remains so great as
a writer in the first person. Anytime I can talk myself into it I use third,
and I’ve still never successfully or wholeheartedly attempted third-person
omniscient. My third is generally first person with “he” or “she” added
on like frosting. I do think third-omniscient provides the most obvious opportunity
for great literature, because it can be so complex and enables all kinds
of fun and layers in playing with the identity and perspective of the invisible
narrator. Someday I’ll try it.
Shalla: Finally,
any writing tips and/or editing tips for writers? Books and reading materials
you’d recommend? Conferences?
Workshops?
Elizabeth: Reading
is so important, and still undervalued. I recommend that writers read the
classics, and/or the modern classics,
and then talk about
them with their friends so much that their friends either buckle from
annoyance and exhaustion or give in and start reading too.
There’s a great reading
revolution going on right now and anyone can tap into it and thus further
their inspiration for reading even more books, for instance in this online “Friendster
for Readers” site that someone recently invited me to, called Goodreads.
Reading literature from the point of view of trying to understand what makes
it “work” is a wonderful tool for learning, and also gives a
writer a larger frame of reference for deciding what they want their own
work to sound and be like.
A writer today
needs to have an original voice and vision, and for some people it’s hard to imagine what such a thing
would look like because all they’ve been exposed to is work by the “usual
suspects”—that mafia of hip and contemporary celebrity authors
writing according to a narrow and circumscribed stylistic set of rules developed
in writing workshops or through the “common wisdom” and “accepted
truths” about narrative landed upon, mostly, in the eighties. Exposing
oneself to as many different styles – writing from alternate times
and places – seems to be one way, paradoxically enough, of learning
how to conceive of writing something fresh.
Shalla: Thanks Elizabeth, very helpful answers! For more on Elizabeth
Kadetsky, please visit: elizabethkadetsky.com
Shalla DeGuzman's short stories have appeared in Poetic
Diversity, the Mosaic Literary Journal, the Mad Hatters Review, etc.;
her articles in The Scriptorium and L.A. Freepress; her skits at the Stella
Adler Theatre.
Her flash fiction The Fish In My Bed recently won the FISH AND
PLANE Competition and is featured in Issue 6 of Mad Hatters
Review.
Shalla, a former writer and producer of a health and fitness cable
show, is currently writing a novel. She is President of The
ShallaDeGuzman Writers
Group where she interviews literary agents, publishers, editors,
etc.
News!
Shalla has
been nominated for the prestigious Pushcart Prize.
SHALLA
Magazine,
which features short stories and excerpts from top, award-winning writers,
is here!
For more on Shalla: www.shalladeguzman.com
|
|
IS
ON
SHALLA
CHATS
SHALLA Magazine
has
arrived

&
we're
always
getting
better
&
better,
&
better...
SHALLA
Magazine
in
your iPod...
on
You Tube...
--oh
my!
Everyone's
a Critic!
Where
our guest assistant editors choose their top 10's or top 5's or... Read what
they say about each one!
Literary Agent
Kelly Sonnack's
TOP
PICKS
Who will we nominate for the Pushcart next?
continue...
Mark Treitel 's
TOP
PICKS
1.
THE REQUIRED ACCOMPANYING COVER LETTER by Richard Fein
2.
Soap by Jared Wahlgren
3.
HILLS LIKE PINK ELEPHANTS by Bruce Stirling
continue...
New!
Winter Blooms Issue
PICKS
Who are we nominating for the Pushcart in 2009?
continue...
EXCLUSIVES
Advice to Writers: from an Editor/Book Publisher
In summary, three vital concepts for the process: Persist; Trust; Revise!
SHALLA CHATS with Seamus Cashman of Wolfhound Press
continue...
SHALLA MINGLES with Mr. Fitness, Alex Cristo
“Writers: Get Fit!”
continue...
|